The Tenured Radical blog on the Chronicle of Higher Education website has a post reflecting on the possible use of a lottery system for admission to competitive universities. Under this system, we would just identify everyone who meets our minimum admission requirements (maybe an 80% average for the required courses?), then run a random selection process that fills the seats. There are some tempting reasons to do this. Continue reading
Application Insights
Offer Revocation Season
This is the start of the season when we start deciding whether to revoke admission offers. The season starts when final grades become available, and lasts throughout the summer as we receive various exam scores and transcripts from around the world. It’s always a bit painful for us, as we have to make hard decisions in some cases. It’s certainly painful for applicants who lose their offer. Continue reading
Exam Anxiety in China
The Toronto Globe and Mail recently ran an article about China’s university entrance exam system, the “gaokao”. I didn’t know that “gaokao” meant “big test”, but it seems like an apt description. The article nicely summarizes some of the pros and cons of such systems, as well as the impact on Canadian university entrance. Continue reading
Waterloo does not have to be #1!
I recently ran across a blog posting with suggestions for home-schooled applicants to Waterloo. Overall, it was quite informative and had good information, with one exception. That’s where it propagates the myth that Waterloo expects to be the applicant’s #1 choice, implying that if Waterloo is not #1 it will somehow insult us or affect the application. Continue reading
How Not to Apply to Waterloo Engineering
In recent weeks staff have come across a few applicants submitting fraudulent documents, like modified unofficial transcripts. I guess some people are desperate and willing to do anything for admission. Once detected, the consequences are serious however. They certainly won’t be admitted to Waterloo, now or ever. In some cases, this information may be circulated to other universities for them to take whatever action they think is appropriate.
Our staff seem to be quite good at detecting fraud. They have extensive training and various cross-checking systems that continue through the application process and even into the Fall when the new students are starting.
It seems unlikely, but it’s hard to know if maybe a very few still get through the screening process. But in the end, if they are really not academically qualified they will soon fail out of our program anyways. We would just prefer they not take up space that a more qualified applicant could have had, so we carry on with scrutinizing documents as best as we can.