Some interesting ideas in this article. Although written for permanent job seekers, it could also be very applicable to co-op students and high school students applying for university programs. Some of those things are what can make you stand out from the crowd, in my experience on the hiring and admissions side.
Stand up comedian? Competitive athlete? Find out what surprising skills should stay on your resume.
Source: 11 Surprising Things to Keep On Your Resume – Glassdoor Blog
Since I’ve left the Admissions role I’m not going to post my traditional graphic of chances for the upcoming cycle, BUT let me introduce you to a new Waterloo engineering admissions-focused blog where you can find it: The Road to Engineering
Follow that blog for updates on current Waterloo Engineering admissions news, suggestions and updates, including some information about the upcoming Ontario Universities Fair.
As high school students return to class, here is some key advice for those planning to apply to university or college. I strongly suggest that when applying to a post-secondary program, it should be treated like applying for a job or career. There should be some significant self-reflection and “selling yourself” to the university. The self-reflection part is derived from Prof. Larry Smith’s book, which I have briefly reviewed before. It’s very important to know why you’re doing something before doing it. The “selling yourself” part builds on this, and can be illustrated with an example that is a composite of stuff we see for Engineering applications. For this example, let’s consider two hypothetical applicants to Mechanical Engineering, both with similar grades (say low 90’s) and similar other activities. Each applicant writes something in their Admission Information Form, along the lines of the following… Continue reading
All offers and rejections for our Engineering programs have now been posted on our Quest system and the offers eventually show up on the OUAC system too. Every year’s admissions seems to get a little more challenging and complicated and this year was no different with about 13,000 applications and the launch of our new Architectural Engineering program. As usual, there are a few happy people and a lot that are not so happy. For perspective, a few statistics might be helpful:
- Applications overall were up between 5 and 10%, but a few programs stood out. Namely, Computer and Systems Design Engineering applications were up about 30% each, and Biomedical up about 15%. Increased applications means higher competition and more rejections since the available spaces didn’t change.
- Overall, about 75% of our applicants did not receive an offer. For some programs like Software and Biomedical Engineering, closer to 90% of applicants didn’t receive offers since there were so many applicants and a very limited number of spaces.
- As usual, we gave out some alternate choice offers in a number of programs, although there are limits to how many we will offer in any one program. This year, a lot of Software applicants put Computer Engineering as an alternate, which makes some sense. But with the 30% increase in Computer applications, there was quite a bottleneck and many were no doubt surprised to get no offer.
At this stage, all of our spaces are now allocated and we wait until the summer to see if the predicted number of people accept the offers. We don’t have an appeal or reconsideration process, because the spaces are filled to the limits (and beyond). We make more offers than there are spaces, with the assumption that a certain fraction will choose to go somewhere else. Generally our predictions are accurate within 1 or 2%, and there are usually no spaces opening up during the summer.
For those with offers to engineering and are thinking about wanting to change programs, our suggestion is to forget about it. Recent experience suggests that it is not likely to happen because of space limitations in most programs, even after first year. The engineering programs have no obligation to take transfers, and lately many have refused to do so. Therefore, if you’re not reasonably sure that you will be satisfied with the offer you have, you should seriously consider another offer. Our open house event for admitted applicants on Saturday May 26 is a good last chance to visit and discuss your potential future program with faculty and students.
As usual around this time of year, we have processed a few offers for applicants who are currently in an Ontario high school. Generally this will fill less than 25% of the available spaces in each program, leaving the large majority of spaces for our final round of decisions in May when we have more complete data for a fair comparison. People who don’t get an offer at this stage are automatically carried forward for consideration then.
The selection process is a bit random at this stage, which is why I don’t like to commit very many spaces. Typically, people with offers at this point have consistently high grade 11 and 12 math, English & science marks, and at least 3 Grade 12 required courses completed. Also they probably ranked in the top end of all the program applicants, taking into account an AIF score (and optional interview score, if one was submitted). It takes us until mid-April to complete all the AIF and interview scoring, so at this stage it’s somewhat random whether those play a significant role or not for any one individual.
Eventually (by the end of April), we get all the Grade 12 marks and other scores, and then it’s much fairer to compare everyone on the same basis. Any high scoring applicants who missed out on the early round will get selected at that point.
For out-of-province applicants (OUAC Form 105), we’ll do a bit of a preliminary offer round in a few weeks when we have more data compiled from transcripts. It’s difficult to say exactly when (it depends on many things), but hopefully by early April to help out those with May 1 offer acceptance deadlines at U.S. universities.
The University of Waterloo recently approved the launch of a new program in Architectural Engineering for September 2018 (subject to approval by the Ontario Quality Council). We will be looking to take in about 85 students in the fall, and we’re rapidly gearing up space and teaching resources. The official announcement is here, and applications are now open! Here are a few key points about the program and admissions for this coming Fall. Continue reading
One of our messages this year is to encourage engineering applicants to do their “homework” before applying, because we have no general first year. This means carefully reflecting on your strengths and weaknesses, interests, aptitudes, career goals, etc. Then carefully examining our different programs, courses, typical career paths, co-op job examples, etc., and selecting the program which seems to be the right fit. Quite possibly, engineering is not the right fit and you should consider something else. In general, people who put some effort into this process will end up in the right program and do well. Why is this so important? Continue reading
An updated version of this popular post, with some revisions for the upcoming September 2018 admissions cycle.
Here is an overview on how the process works and the approximate timelines. As usual, this is specific to Waterloo Engineering admissions; other programs and universities will have their own unique variations. Also, make sure you look through our admissions webpages for exact deadlines and official requirements since this is just an unofficial, quick overview and I can’t cover every detail for every variety of applicant and situation. Continue reading
To start the new academic year and next admission cycle, the 2018 Admissions brochures for Engineering and other programs have recently been uploaded on the Waterloo website. We continue to include a table showing admission probabilities (“chances”) for different programs and grade ranges (at the end of the brochure, and another online version is available here). Many people find it useful for assessing their chances at admission, and then they can plan accordingly and have realistic expectations. This is based on the 2017 results and as usual we caution that 2018 may be different, since it all depends on the number of applicants (which is unknown in advance and can fluctuate).
For convenience and readability in a table, we lump the grades into ranges. Some people find the big jumps in probability between the different grade ranges to be difficult to understand or interpret, so I have been generating graphs that provide interpolations between the various grades in finer detail (see the end of the post for methodology, if interested). As usual, the grades shown below are the raw, unadjusted averages of the Grade 12 required courses (or equivalents), not including any other factors such as scores for extracurriculars, work experience, or awards. Continue reading
It’s been quite a while since last posting, as various higher priority things arose, such as managing the admissions process, teaching various courses, and directing several larger research projects. Things are still quite busy, but there is time for a quick overview of what’s happened as we gear up for the next admission cycle for September 2018.
For the 2017 cycle just finished, in very rough numbers…
- we had around 12,500 applicants for our 1,600 spaces in Engineering. That was a couple of hundred more than last year.
- we had a significant rise in applications from people in the U.S., possibly because of our increasing presence there by alumni, co-op students, and other friends of the university?
- our estimates worked out well and the programs were filled to capacity.
- as in previous years, Biomedical and Software Engineering were highly competitive, and the rest not too far behind. I’ll work on a new “chances” post for the fall, but there probably aren’t going to be very big differences from the Chances 2017 version.
- as always, picking a few applicants from among so many good ones continued to be challenging. As an indication, over 3,000 applicants with 90+% averages did not receive an offer to any engineering program. Unfortunately we just don’t have enough facilities, space, faculty and staff to take any more.
There are lots of other interesting (hopefully?) things I plan to post in the coming weeks and months about admissions, research, our students, and engineering in general.