Choosing An Engineering Program

The online application centre recently opened for our Fall 2013 intake, and we have almost 200 applicants already!  Like all of our applicants, they had to make that tough first decision:  which engineering program should I apply to?  That’s because Waterloo does not have a general first year.  The curriculum is discipline-specific right from the first day of classes.

The reason for this lack of a general first year is simple.  All of our programs are based on the co-operative education model (experiential learning), where you alternate between on-campus academic learning, and paid employment where you learn the practical aspects of engineering and business.  This starts in first year, so to make it work effectively you need to know  where your career interests probably lie.  This doesn’t mean you’re locked into something forever, but you need a starting point at least .

There are a few other advantages of starting in your program right away:  1) the people you meet will be your classmates for the rest of your program (and potential study partners, roommates, etc.); 2) your courses can be flavoured for your discipline, even if it’s a common course like calculus; 3) there’s no need to worry about competing for limited space in popular programs for 2nd year.

The downside of course, is that you have to do some upfront work before applying to Waterloo and decide which program most likely matches your interests.  For some people, they’ve known this for years and this is easy, but for others it’s a struggle.  So, for those people consider this to be your first Waterloo engineering homework assignment.

To help applicants out with this homework, our Management Engineering students created an online quiz a few years ago.  This quiz was developed based on an extensive survey of our current students, using data mining and regression analysis techniques they learned in class. It can be accessed at this website.  Based on your answers, it gives 3 possible choices for a program that might best fit your interests.  It’s not perfect of course, and you might not have any interest in some of the suggestions.  But it can be quite useful for identifying programs that maybe you hadn’t thought about before.  So, it’s sort of a screening tool to help narrow down your search a bit.

Once you identify a few programs of possible interest, you’ll have to do some further research.  A web search can be helpful, but here are a couple of sites that seem to have good information:  http://www.tryengineering.org/become.php?page=majors_eng  and http://www.egfi-k12.org/engineer-your-path/   The more you read, the easier it will be to find some examples of careers and programs that seem like the best fit.  Other information sources include:  family friends or employers, visiting Waterloo or your local university and speaking to students and faculty, or possibly a teacher in your high school studied engineering.

If after going through all this you’re still ambivalent about the choices, there are lots of other universities with general first year engineering programs.  You can postpone your decision for another year by going there.

What if you start a program at Waterloo and then want to change your mind?  That happens, and we do our best to accommodate changes.  But we usually find that after going through this homework exercise, the vast majority of students are happy with their choice (probably 98%+).  So it seems that most people get the “right answer” when they do the homework.

University Rankings: Round 4 – Times Higher Ed

Next up in the international university rankings, we have the 2012/2013 Times Higher Education (THE) rankings.  More specifically, we’ll look at the Engineering & Technology rankings.

Methodology

I’ve had trouble trying to figure out this methodology.  According to their website, the weighting of the different factors is given at the foot of the tables, but I can’t find it!  So here’s a summary of the general methodology (used for overall rankings?), although it may be a bit different for the Engineering & Technology subject grouping. Continue reading

University Rankings: Round 2 – Webometrics

The “Ranking Web of Universities” or Webometrics ranking was recently updated.  I have never noticed it in the past, so it’s new to me.  The first thing to say is that it is a university-wide ranking, and not specific to Engineering.  In the sub-section for Canada, Waterloo ranks #11, and #198 worldwide.  Not bad I suppose, but as usual let’s look at what it is actually measuring. Continue reading

University Rankings: Round 1 – ARWU

The first set of university rankings has been released for this academic year.  This is the ARWU (academic ranking of world universities) put out by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.  I’m going to focus on the rankings of “Engineering/Technology and Computer Sciences” category, since that’s most relevant to my interests, and they can be found at this link.  Since prospective students and parents sometimes spend a lot of time and effort pondering on the meaning of these rankings, let’s go through them together. Continue reading

Repeated Courses and Why We Care

Admission to our Engineering programs requires the completion of certain Grade 12 courses (or equivalents in various other school systems), specifically Functions, Calculus, English, Chemistry and Physics in Ontario.  For many years we have discouraged the idea of re-taking any of these required courses to boost marks and get a competitive edge for admission.  In recent years, this has taken the form of a penalty of around 5% points off the overall average of the required courses if one or more are repeated (the higher grade is used).  The net effect is that unless the repeated course(s) add at least another 30 percentage points to the total, repeating a course is not worthwhile for competitive advantage in admissions.  In many cases, repeating course(s) will knock the application out of the competition completely.  Other universities seem to have a range of approaches, from accepting repeats without question to ignoring the improved grade completely.  So, we’re somewhere in between.  But why use this penalty approach? Continue reading

Powering Up Relativistic Baseball

There’s a cute post on the consequences of a pitcher throwing a baseball at 90% of the speed of light (see Relativistic Baseball).  (cute for geeky people like me, at least).  The author assumes that the baseball somehow accelerates from rest to 90% of light speed without worrying about how that occurs.  But, as a chemical engineer I have to wonder about the energy requirements for achieving 0.9c, so I did a calculation on the change in kinetic energy of a baseball from rest. Continue reading

Is it 2013 already?

Many of our newest students haven’t quite finished high school yet, but we’re already working on the Fall 2013 admissions.  Brochures are going to print, events are being scheduled and international outreach activities are being planned.

I don’t forsee any significant changes in admission requirements, but competition for the limited number of spaces will likely continue to be strong.

Welcome!

I have taught in the Chemical Engineering program, and formerly managed Engineering’s undergraduate admission process.  I’m semi-retired but continue to lead and participate in research projects and help out on some teaching.  On this site is a collection of past posts about admissions, and  I’ll continue to write about issues  related to engineering research, teaching, education and admissions from time to time.   Comments and general questions are welcomed, but I can’t give detailed feedback on your specific circumstances.  Please contact the university for expert advice related to current admissions and see The Road to Engineering for posts from the current Director of Admissions.