Choosing An Engineering Program

The online application centre recently opened for our Fall 2013 intake, and we have almost 200 applicants already!  Like all of our applicants, they had to make that tough first decision:  which engineering program should I apply to?  That’s because Waterloo does not have a general first year.  The curriculum is discipline-specific right from the first day of classes.

The reason for this lack of a general first year is simple.  All of our programs are based on the co-operative education model (experiential learning), where you alternate between on-campus academic learning, and paid employment where you learn the practical aspects of engineering and business.  This starts in first year, so to make it work effectively you need to know  where your career interests probably lie.  This doesn’t mean you’re locked into something forever, but you need a starting point at least .

There are a few other advantages of starting in your program right away:  1) the people you meet will be your classmates for the rest of your program (and potential study partners, roommates, etc.); 2) your courses can be flavoured for your discipline, even if it’s a common course like calculus; 3) there’s no need to worry about competing for limited space in popular programs for 2nd year.

The downside of course, is that you have to do some upfront work before applying to Waterloo and decide which program most likely matches your interests.  For some people, they’ve known this for years and this is easy, but for others it’s a struggle.  So, for those people consider this to be your first Waterloo engineering homework assignment.

To help applicants out with this homework, our Management Engineering students created an online quiz a few years ago.  This quiz was developed based on an extensive survey of our current students, using data mining and regression analysis techniques they learned in class. It can be accessed at this website.  Based on your answers, it gives 3 possible choices for a program that might best fit your interests.  It’s not perfect of course, and you might not have any interest in some of the suggestions.  But it can be quite useful for identifying programs that maybe you hadn’t thought about before.  So, it’s sort of a screening tool to help narrow down your search a bit.

Once you identify a few programs of possible interest, you’ll have to do some further research.  A web search can be helpful, but here are a couple of sites that seem to have good information:  http://www.tryengineering.org/become.php?page=majors_eng  and http://www.egfi-k12.org/engineer-your-path/   The more you read, the easier it will be to find some examples of careers and programs that seem like the best fit.  Other information sources include:  family friends or employers, visiting Waterloo or your local university and speaking to students and faculty, or possibly a teacher in your high school studied engineering.

If after going through all this you’re still ambivalent about the choices, there are lots of other universities with general first year engineering programs.  You can postpone your decision for another year by going there.

What if you start a program at Waterloo and then want to change your mind?  That happens, and we do our best to accommodate changes.  But we usually find that after going through this homework exercise, the vast majority of students are happy with their choice (probably 98%+).  So it seems that most people get the “right answer” when they do the homework.

What’s the Cut-Off?

Around this time of year, “What’s the cut-off?” is probably the most common question we get about admission to our engineering programs.  A very reasonable question, and one that helps potential applicants know their chances for admission.  Unfortunately, it’s a question we can’t really answer.  Not because we’re secretive or trying to be coy, it’s just a question without a direct answer for a number of  reasons. Continue reading

University Rankings: Round 4 – Times Higher Ed

Next up in the international university rankings, we have the 2012/2013 Times Higher Education (THE) rankings.  More specifically, we’ll look at the Engineering & Technology rankings.

Methodology

I’ve had trouble trying to figure out this methodology.  According to their website, the weighting of the different factors is given at the foot of the tables, but I can’t find it!  So here’s a summary of the general methodology (used for overall rankings?), although it may be a bit different for the Engineering & Technology subject grouping. Continue reading

Meeting Your Waterloo – Quantum-Nano Centre

Today was the official opening for the new Quantum-Nano Centre (QNC) on the Waterloo campus, sponsored in-part by the co-founder of RIM and the Blackberry, Mike Lazaridis.  This will be the new “home” for our Nanotechnology Engineering students, with classrooms, teaching and research labs, faculty offices, and meeting spaces where people can collaborate.  The opening ceremonies had the usual speeches, which were actually quite inspirational.  But the biggest excitement was generated at the start when Prof. Stephen Hawking from Cambridge delivered the opening address! Continue reading

Thinking About Mining Engineering

The Macleans article I referenced in a previous post had a story about mining engineering, and the many lucrative career opportunities that are opening up in Canada.  Part of this is the increased demand for resources (a similar story for petroleum), but part is the well-known demographic wave of upcoming retirements among engineering professionals.  This is a challenge in many industries, and not unique to mining.  There are a couple of things to say about this article, however. Continue reading

University Rankings: Round 2 – Webometrics

The “Ranking Web of Universities” or Webometrics ranking was recently updated.  I have never noticed it in the past, so it’s new to me.  The first thing to say is that it is a university-wide ranking, and not specific to Engineering.  In the sub-section for Canada, Waterloo ranks #11, and #198 worldwide.  Not bad I suppose, but as usual let’s look at what it is actually measuring. Continue reading

Top Ten Ways to Fail Your Engineering Program

Classes will be starting shortly, and this is the time when new students typically get some advice for their future studies.  If you search around the web, you’ll find lots of blogs, books, forums, and pages with suggestions for how to succeed in university and engineering programs.  Rather than add one more, I think I’ll provide the following list for students who want to fail out and toss away the $10,000 (or more) it cost in tuition and living expenses to attend for a term.  These suggestions are based on many years of observation as an academic advisor dealing with failed-out students, so they’re guaranteed to work!  They are somewhat specific to Waterloo Engineering, but I bet that many will  work for other programs too. Continue reading

University Rankings: Round 1 – ARWU

The first set of university rankings has been released for this academic year.  This is the ARWU (academic ranking of world universities) put out by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.  I’m going to focus on the rankings of “Engineering/Technology and Computer Sciences” category, since that’s most relevant to my interests, and they can be found at this link.  Since prospective students and parents sometimes spend a lot of time and effort pondering on the meaning of these rankings, let’s go through them together. Continue reading